Wylie v. Faust

962 F.2d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert S. WYLIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Timothy FAUST, individually and as an agent of the State of Nevada; Paul Jackson, individually and as an agent of the State of Nevada; George Sumner; George Deeds; Marcia Allen; Judy Hamilton, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-15013. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 17, 1992. * Decided April 30, 1992. Before SCHROEDER, LEAVY and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Wylie brought a civil rights action against the defendants (collectively "Faust") pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Faust, and Wylie appeals. We assume without deciding that Wylie's notice of appeal was timely filed, thus vesting us with jurisdiction, and we affirm. 3 * Faust moved for summary judgment on September 1, 1988. Wylie did not file an opposition to the motion. On October 3, 1988, the district court entered an…