United States v. Everett M. Woodson

962 F.2d 16 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Everett M. WOODSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-10559. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. * Decided May 6, 1992. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, BRUNETTI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Everett Woodson was convicted of twelve counts of sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2244. He appeals, arguing that the district court should have suppressed his written confession because it was obtained in violation of his Miranda rights. We affirm. I. 3 Woodson's single argument on appeal is that his Miranda waiver did not extend to questioning after the polygraph examination had ended. 1 As a result, he argues that his confession was obtained in violation of Miranda and should have been suppressed. This issue falls under the "knowledge and awareness" prong of the test for Miranda waivers. See Derrick…