Drollinger v. State Of Arizona

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 5531·962 F.2d 956·30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1436·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7737·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3555
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 199290-16591California1,560 words

Opinion

Opinion

962 F.2d 956 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1436 , 121 Lab.Cas. P 35,632 Danny F. DROLLINGER, Shaun K. Fitzgerald, Jerry G. Fuller, Michael J. Hanks, Daniel L. Hogg, Ernest J. Murray, William H. Simpson, and Ronald L. Shannon, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford, Governor, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-16591. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1991. Decided April 27, 1992. Kimberlee Keller, Weinberg & Dempsey, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellants. Linda A. Thompson, Atty. Gen.'s Office, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before: POOLE, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants allege that Arizona violated Section 8 of the 1985 Amendments to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. ("the FLSA"), by making two changes in its method of paying state firefighters after those Amendments became effective. The first change modified the state firefighters' hourly wage rate and established a separate overtime rate. The second change eliminated the previous policy of counting leave time as time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.