Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Haugen

963 F.2d 378 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. Loretta J. HAUGEN, a single woman, Defendant, and Transamerica Insurance Company, a California Corporation, Defendant-cross-defendant-Appellee, Ludwig Builders, Incorporated, an Arizona Corporation, et al., Defendant-counter-claimants-crossclaimants-Appellants. No. 90-16621. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1991. Decided May 1, 1992. 1 Before WILLIAM A. NORRIS and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and GILLIAM, District Judge * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Ludwig Builders ("LBI") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Aetna Casualty ("AC") and Transamerica Insurance Company ("TIC"). The district court found AC and TIC never had a duty to defend or indemnify LBI for a suit which arose out of LBI's construction and sale of a house. We have jurisdiction…