Andres Carrasco Aragon v. United States of America, Andres Carrasco Aragon v. United States

963 F.2d 378 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andres Carrasco ARAGON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. Andres Carrasco ARAGON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 91-35796, 91-35797. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1992. * Decided May 15, 1992. Before PREGERSON, TROTT and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andres Carrasco Aragon, a federal prisoner serving a forty-year sentence for violation of federal narcotics laws, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his two habeas corpus petitions. Aragon argues (1) his plea of guilty was not knowing and voluntary because the advice of his counsel did not rise to the level of effective assistance, and (2) the plea agreement was violated. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (1988), and we affirm. 3 * "A claim of ineffective assistance [of counsel] may be used to attack the…