Gary L. Loven v. Guy F. Atkinson Company, a Nevada Corporation

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary L. LOVEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GUY F. ATKINSON COMPANY, a Nevada corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35083. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. * Decided May 18, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge and CROCKER, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant, Gary L. Loven, appeals summary judgment against him in favor of Guy F. Atkinson Co. Loven had sued Atkinson for unpaid compensation and breach of contract arising under Oregon Revised Statutes §§ 652.110 to 652.250, and asks for attorney's fees pursuant to Oregon Statute § 652.200. 4 The District Court had diversity jurisdiction, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 from the final judgment. 5 Gary L. Loven was president and general manager of Bingham International, Inc. a subsidiary of Guy F. Atkinson Co. when Sulzer Brothers obtained an option to purchase…