Johnny Pattillo v. George Sumner

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Johnny PATTILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George SUMNER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 11, 1992. * Decided May 14, 1992. Before CHAMBERS, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Johnny Pattillo brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against numerous Nevada state prison officials (collectively Sumner). The district court, in several memorandum decisions and orders, dismissed the bulk of Pattillo's claims and granted summary judgment in favor of Sumner on the remaining claims. Pattillo now appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In his opening brief, Pattillo merely reasserts, without argument, the claims raised before the district court. Pattillo contends that false documents were placed in his file, that he was transferred among various prisons within Nevada without due process, that he…