Kenneth C. Long v. U.S. Parole Commission Peter Carlson

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth C. LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION; Peter Carlson, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-16349. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1992. Decided May 13, 1992. Before GOODWIN, SCHROEDER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kenneth Long appeals the district court's order granting the respondents' post-judgment motion in this habeas corpus proceeding. Long alleged the United States Parole Commission violated his due process rights in conducting his parole revocation hearing when it failed to notify him prior to the hearing that his "street time" credit was subject to forfeiture. The district court ordered that Long's street time be restored. Upon the Government's Motion for Reconsideration, however, the district court modified the relief granted to Long and ordered that he receive a new parole hearing rather than restoration of street time. We…