Bernard T. Remley v. Douglas Struthers and Robert Cooke

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Bernard T. REMLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas STRUTHERS and Robert Cooke, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15526. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 20, 1992. * Decided May 1, 1992. Before FARRIS, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Bernard Remley appeals pro se from the district court's order striking various documents from the district court record based on Remley's failure to comply with an order to show cause why two of his cases should not be consolidated. This court lacks jurisdiction because the order was not final. We dismiss the appeal. 3 The district court ordered Remley to show cause why the action below should proceed separately from a "substantially similar" action Remley commenced at the same time. It also ordered that "[n]o further documents shall be filed until the court instructs otherwise." Subsequently, Remley filed numerous documents without…