Glen Richard Long v. C.L. Ryan, Warden, A.S.P.C.

Good Law
963 F.2d 379·1992 WL 104804·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23716
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 199291-16563California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Glen Richard LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.L. RYAN, Warden, A.S.P.C., Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-16563. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1992. * Decided May 18, 1992. 1 Before REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Local Rule 76(a) of the District of Arizona requires pro se habeas petitions to be filed on appropriate forms. Long's petition did not comply with this Rule. In its order of May 7, 1991, the district court ordered Long to file an amended petition within thirty days. The order specifically stated that "[t]he amended petition must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety," and included the following warning: "The petitioner should take notice that if he fails to timely file an amended petition, the Clerk of the Court will enter a dismissal of the action without further notice to the petitioner" (emphasis added). We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.