Haugen v. Brady

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Elva J. HAUGEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Barbara BRADY, individually and as Director of Clark County Social Services; Barbara Clark, individually and as Clark County Child Welfare Licensing Officer; Ruth Ann Zachariah; Mary Ann Muratore; Robert Pressman, all individually and as employees of Clark County Social Services; the County of Clark; Paul Christensen, individually and as Chairman of the Clark County Commissioners; State of Nevada; Danel Hahn; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15691. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 15, 1992. * Decided May 20, 1992. Before HUG, SKOPIL and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Elva J. Haugen appeals from the district court's order of March 20, 1991 dismissing her case for repeated failure to amend her complaint in conformity with the court's previous orders. Haugen filed a motion for reconsideration on April 2, 1991. On April 16, 1991, while…