Kenneth James Jarvis v. Carl Zenon, Superintendent, Osci

Good Law
963 F.2d 379·1992 WL 107056·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23712
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 199291-35601California1,634 words

Opinion

Opinion

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth James JARVIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Carl ZENON, Superintendent, OSCI, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-35601. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1992. * Decided May 12, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and LEVI, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Jarvis appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He raises three issues in this appeal relating to actions taken by the Oregon Board of Parole (Board). He argues that the Board: (1) denied him due process at his hearing; (2) erred in finding certain aggravating factors which were also elements of the offenses for which he was convicted; and (3) erred in running his sentences consecutively rather than concurrently. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.