Lily Gill v. Hewlett Packard, Incorporated

963 F.2d 379 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lily GILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HEWLETT PACKARD, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55432. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1992. * Decided May 14, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Lily Gill appeals the dismissal without prejudice of her Title VII action. Finding that the district judge did not abuse his discretion, we affirm. 4 Gill's action, filed in state court, was removed to federal district court by the defendant, which filed its answer on December 5, 1990. On January 18, 1991, the district judge filed an Order to Show Cause by February 4 why the case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Local Rule 6.2, which requires counsel to file with the court a Joint Report of Early Meeting within 14 days of the early meeting. The report sets forth preliminary schedules, likelihood of…