United States v. James Dannals, United States of America v. David Beland

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James DANNALS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BELAND, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 89-50601, 89-50602. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted on Briefs May 6, 1992 * in No. 89-50601. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1992 in No. 89-50602. Decided May 19, 1992. Before TANG, SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 These two appeals arise out of the convictions of James Dannals and David Beland who participated together in the same methamphetamine manufacturing organization. Counsel in Dannals' appeal has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Beland challenges his sentence. 3 We have reviewed the record in Dannals' case. Counsel for Dannals has also reviewed the record and has found no arguable issues requiring reversal. A copy of the Anders brief was served on…