United States v. Isidro Calderon Contreras

Good Law
963 F.2d 380·1992 WL 107048
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 199290-30054California605 words

Opinion

Opinion

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Isidro Calderon CONTRERAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30054. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1992. * Decided May 12, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and LEVI, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Calderon Contreras appeals his sentence of 60 months' imprisonment following a conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1)(c). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Calderon Contreras argues that the district court erroneously adjusted his sentence upward two levels for possession of a firearm. Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(b) requires a trial court to apply a two point enhancement to the base offense level if it finds that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.