United States v. Jesus Guzman-Gonzales

Good Law
963 F.2d 380·1992 WL 102683·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 199291-50268California437 words

Opinion

Opinion

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus GUZMAN-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50268. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 6, 1992. * Decided May 14, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING, FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MACBRIDE, Senior District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 To decide a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we must determine "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." United States v. Medina, 940 F.2d 1247, 1250 (9th Cir.1991) (citations omitted). A conspiracy requires: 1) an agreement to accomplish an illegal objective; 2) coupled with one or more overt acts; and 3) the requisite intent necessary to commit the underlying substantive offense. Id. 4 The testimony of several witness confirmed that the 16703 Brookport…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.