United States v. Kirsten Holmes

Good Law
963 F.2d 380·1992 WL 102677·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 14, 199291-30200California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kirsten HOLMES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30200. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 14, 1992. Before PREGERSON, TROTT and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Kirsten Holmes appeals the district court's order denying her motion to reinstate her appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 Holmes participated in a protest at the Federal Building in Olympia, Washington. She was arrested for failing to comply with with lawful directions given by Federal Protective Services Officers. After a bench trial in front of a Magistrate, Holmes was found guilty. The district court upheld her conviction on September 12, 1990. She filed a notice of appeal on September 20, 1990. Holmes' appeal was voluntarily withdrawn on September 21, 1990. 4 Holmes filed a motion to reinstate her appeal on November 2, 1990. Her motion was denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.