United States v. Robert Barry Jordan, United States of America v. Kimberly Ann Jordan, United States of America v. Gregory Allen Etherton

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Barry JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly Ann JORDAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Allen ETHERTON, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30190, 91-30191 and 91-30210. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1992. Decided May 13, 1992. Before CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Defendants Robert Jordan, Kimberly Jordan and Gregory Etherton pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute more than fifty marihuana plants, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 841(b)(1)(C) and 846. All defendants appeal the denial of their motion for a Franks hearing, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the plant count, and the calculation of their sentences. In a separate opinion,…