United States v. Robert Elizaha Dixon

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Elizaha DIXON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50408. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 4, 1992. * Decided May 13, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and CAUFIELD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Robert Dixon appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines for two counts of armed robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) and (d), and one count of use of a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his court-appointed attorney, Carol A. Klauschie, has filed a brief stating that she finds no issues for review and requesting permission to withdraw. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 , 82-83 & n. 6 (1988), discloses no issues for review. 4…