United States v. Sergio Garcia

963 F.2d 380 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50305. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 18, 1992. Before ALARCON, WILLIAM A. NORRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sergio Garcia ("Garcia") appeals from the judgment of conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 . He seeks reversal on the ground that the evidence of guilt was insufficient. He also contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion for a new trial based on the Government's failure to disclose evidence. 3 We affirm because we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to demonstrate Garcia's guilt of each offense, and the district court did not abuse its discretion…