United States v. Albert Yarbrow

963 F.2d 381 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Albert YARBROW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30056. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1992. Decided May 19, 1992. 1 Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judge, and CROCKER, * District Judge. MEMORANDUM 2 Yarbrow appeals his conviction for conspiracy and other offenses. We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 3 Yarbrow contends that the district court erred by determining that there was sufficient evidence to support the conspiracy verdict. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence against Yarbrow, we must determine whether "viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and respecting the jury's ability to judge the credibility of the witnesses, resolve factual conflicts, and draw inferences, a rational jury could have found the…