United States v. Jaime Gurrola Madrid, United States of America v. Cesar Cazarez-Payan, United States of America v. Alejos Juan Avalos

963 F.2d 381 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime Gurrola MADRID, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar CAZAREZ-PAYAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejos Juan AVALOS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30082, 91-30116 and 91-30153. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 8, 1992. * Decided May 12, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and GOODWIN and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Madrid, Cazarez-Payan, and Avalos pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Cazarez-Payan also pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (b)(1). They appeal their sentences imposed under the Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). The district court…