United States v. Reynaldo Brito-Acosta

Good Law
963 F.2d 1284·1992 WL 91335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 7, 199291-30271California454 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reynaldo Brito-Acosta (Brito) was convicted of unlawfully being in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . He appeals the calculation of his sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1) (Nov.1990). We affirm.

FACTS

On June 25, 1991, Brito pled guilty to being illegally in the United States on November 13, 1990 in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . On July 18, 1991, he was sentenced to eighteen months imprisonment and two years supervised release. His base offense level was enhanced by four levels under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1) because he was previously deported after sustaining a conviction for a felony, second degree assault. His deportation was based on a misdemeanor conviction for unlawfully possessing a firearm.

DISCUSSION

Brito claims that it is improper to increase the offense level when a person is not deported for the prior felony itself. We have had occasion to apply section 2L1.2(b)(1). See United States v. Olvera-Cervantes, 960 F.2d 101 (9th Cir.1992); United States v. Arias-Granados, 941 F.2d 996 (9th Cir.1991). However, we have not previously considered the argument Brito now makes. Upon considering the argument, we find it to be without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.