Dix v. County of Shasta

963 F.2d 1296 William Edward DIX, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The COUNTY OF SHASTA; Shasta County District Attorney's Office; Stephen S. Carlton, Individually and as District Attorney for the County of Shasta; Shasta County Sheriff's Department; Sheriff Phil Eoff, Individually and in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Shasta County; Detective Larry Jarrett, Individually and in his official capacity as a Deputy Sheriff for the County of Shasta; the County of Humboldt; Humboldt County District Attorney's Office; Terry R. Farmer, Individually and in his official capacity as the District Attorney for Humboldt County; Kate Green, Individually and in her official capacity as the Director of the Humboldt County Victim Witness Program; Alan Dale Bradley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 90-16441. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 7, 1991. Decided May 8, 1992. As Amended June 18, 1992. Bernard C. DePaoli, Eureka, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant William Edward Dix. James C. Pappas, John E. Hayashida, Halkides & Morgan, Redding, Cal., for defendants-appellees County of Shasta, et al. C. Todd Endres, Dale A. Reinholtsen, Mitchell, Dedekam & Angell,…