Armstrong v. Meyers

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 6750·964 F.2d 948·140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10891·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4291
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199291-55101California2,137 words

Opinion

Opinion

964 F.2d 948 140 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2392 , 122 Lab.Cas. P 10,299 Norman ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward R. MEYERS, in his capacity as Manager of the Mail and Messenger Service, University of California at Los Angeles; Raymond Schultze, in his capacity as Administrative Vice Chancellor, University of California at Los Angeles, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55101. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 7, 1992. Decided May 19, 1992. Cecil Marr and Diane Marchant, Marr & Marchant, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant. Fred Takemiya, Office of the General Counsel, University of California, Oakland, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, Circuit Judge, JONES, District Judge. * PER CURIAM: 1 Norman Armstrong filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging he was discharged from his job at the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) without due process. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. We affirm. 2 * The University fired Armstrong, an employee in its Mail and Messenger Service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.