United States v. County of San Diego

Good Law
38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,333·92 Daily Journal DAR 6743·965 F.2d 691·1992 WL 103096·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 10892
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 19, 199291-55321California3,754 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

The United States of America (government) appeals from a district court decision denying its motion for summary judgment and granting partial summary judgment to the County of San Diego (County). We are presented with the question of whether General Atomics, a federal contractor, has an independent possessory interest in a government-owned experimental fusion device (device) subject to California’s ad valorem property tax. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 , 1345. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b). We affirm.

I

The United States Department of Energy (Department) funds and administers nuclear fusion research at several locations throughout the country in an attempt to develop a magnetically confined fusion system capable of generating commercial electric power. See Magnetic Fusion Energy Engineering Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9301 (b)(1). General Atomics, a private scientific research firm, maintains and operates a federally owned experimental fusion device at its San Diego facility. Pursuant to seven different cost reimbursement contracts, General Atomics provides services to the government with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.