Seattle Audubon Society v. F. Dale Robertson, in His Official Capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service United States Forest Service, an Agency of the United States, Washington Contract Loggers Association v. F. Dale Robertson, in His Official Capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service, Seattle Audubon Society v. John L. Evans, in His Official Capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service, United States Forest Service, an Agency of the United States, and Washington Contract Loggers Association, Defendants-Intervenors

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 7680·965 F.2d 776·23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20020·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12461·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4655
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199291-35378California293 words

Opinion

Opinion

965 F.2d 776 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,020 SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. F. Dale ROBERTSON, * in his official capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service; United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States, et al., Defendants-Appellants. WASHINGTON CONTRACT LOGGERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. F. Dale ROBERTSON, in his official capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service, et al., Defendants-Appellants. SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John L. EVANS, in his official capacity as Chief, United States Forest Service, United States Forest Service, an agency of the United States, Defendants-Appellants, and Washington Contract Loggers Association, et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Nos. 91-35378, 91-35564. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 19, 1992. ** Decided June 2, 1992. Anne S. Almy, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants. Victor M. Sher, Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellees. Mark C. Rutzick, Preston, Thorgrimson, Shidler, Gates & Ellis, Portland, Or., for defendants-intervenors-appellees. Appeal from the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.