James Gomez v. The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 7495·966 F.2d 465·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12605·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4723
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199292-70237California91 words

Opinion

966 F.2d 465 James GOMEZ and Daniel Vasquez, Petitioners, v. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. David Fierro, Robert Harris, and Alejandro Gilbert Ruiz, Real Parties In Interest. No. 92-70237. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 4, 1992. Prior Report: 9th Cir., 966 F.2d 460 . Before: ALARCON, BRUNETTI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc and the emergency motion for stay of the mandate filed April 20, 1992, are each denied as moot.