Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company, Beckman Industries, Inc. Smithkline Beckman, and Monsanto Company Reichhold Limited Fmc Corporation Bridgestone/firestone, Intervenors-Appellees v. International Insurance Company

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 7499·966 F.2d 470·22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 932·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 12324·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4700
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 199290-55859California3,435 words

Opinion

Opinion

966 F.2d 470 22 Fed.R.Serv.3d 932 BECKMAN INDUSTRIES, INC.; Smithkline Beckman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Stauffer Chemical Company, Intervenors-Appellees, v. INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. BECKMAN INDUSTRIES, INC.; Smithkline Beckman, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Monsanto Company; Reichhold Limited; FMC Corporation; Bridgestone/Firestone, Intervenors-Appellees, v. INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-55859, 90-55871. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 4, 1992 * . Decided June 4, 1992. Kathryn Doi, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Andrew Lundberg, Latham & Watkins, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Jeffrey B. Maletta, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Washington, D.C., for intervenor Stauffer Chemical Co. Karen L. Bush, Anderson, Kill, Olick & Oshinsky, Washington, D.C., and David W. Steuber, Hill Wynne Troop & Meisinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for intervenors Monsanto Co., Reichhold Limited, FMC Corp. and Bridgestone-Firestone, Inc. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.