Philip Jesse Charlesworth v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 7920·966 F.2d 1323·1992 WL 126612·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13311·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4925
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 199291-70298California1,278 words

Opinion

Opinion

Farris, J.

Philip Charlesworth petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' conclusion that he is not entitled to a discretionary waiver of deportation under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended, 8 . U.S.C. § 1182(c). He argues that the Board: (1) abused its discretion in reversing the immi-gration judge’s grant of section 212(c) relief and (2) violated his due process rights by reopening the deportation proceedings sua sponte and supplementing the record with a letter from Judith Charlesworth. We have jurisdiction pursuant to section 106(a) of the Immigration Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We affirm.

FACTS

Philip Charlesworth, a native and citizen of Great Britain, entered the United States on August 24, 1973. Charlesworth was nineteen or twenty years old at the time. On April 9, 1976, he married a U.S. citizen whom he had been living with since 1973, and, on September 27, 1977, his status was adjusted to lawful permanent resident.

Approximately two years later, Charles-worth decided to move to Hawaii in order to earn a living restoring automobiles. At the time, his wife, Judith Charlesworth, was gainfully employed in San Francisco and decided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.