Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. United States of America, Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., and Sea Airmotive, Inc., Gay Airways, Inc., A.E. Gay, Inc., and A.E. Gay v. United States

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 7982·967 F.2d 307·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 13447·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5010
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 15, 199291-35324California731 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 307 BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., Plaintiff, and Sea Airmotive, Inc., Gay Airways, Inc., A.E. Gay, Inc., and A.E. Gay, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-35324, 91-35338. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1992 * . Decided June 15, 1992. Jonathon M. Hoffman, Martin, Bischoff, Templeton, Langslet & Hoffman, Portland, Or., Susan M. West, Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiffs-appellants. Wendy L. Rome, Civ. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. Before: FARRIS, NORRIS, and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. FARRIS, Circuit Judge: 1 The facts are set forth in our prior opinion in this matter. See Bell Helicopter v. United States, 833 F.2d 1375, 1376-77 (9th Cir.1987). On remand, the district court held that: (1) Bell's, Sea Airmotive's, and Gay Airways' implied contractual indemnity and noncontractual indemnity claims are barred by the Alaska Workers' Compensation Act and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.