Rose Marie Adams-Ficarro v. Bert B. Bailey, Judge A. Richard Grant, Judge Cathy L. Naugle, Judge

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rose Marie ADAMS-FICARRO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bert B. BAILEY, Judge; A. Richard Grant, Judge; CATHY L. NAUGLE, Judge, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35940. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 3, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID K. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rose Marie Adams-Ficarro appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). We review for abuse of discretion, Denton v. Hernandez, 60 U.S.L.W. 4346 , 4348 (May 4, 1992), and we affirm. 3 It is firmly established that judges are immune from liability under section 1983 for acts committed within the course of their official duties. Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 553-54 (1967); Ashelman v. Pope, 793 F.2d 1072, 1075 (9th Cir.1986) (judges have absolute immunity for judicial actions taken within the subject…