Thomas R. Angel Loretta C. Angel v. Judge Charles W. Froehlich, Jr.

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas R. ANGEL; Loretta C. Angel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Judge Charles W. FROEHLICH, Jr., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-55952. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 3, 1992. * Decided June 12, 1992. Before D.W. NELSON, BOOCHEVER and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 This pro se appeal by the Angels of the dismissal of their suit against Judge Froehlich (Angel II ) repeats their 1988 federal court appeal in a substantially identical suit against Froehlich and other judges. Angel v. Froehlich, No. 87-5965 (9th Cir. Jan. 14, 1988), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 984 (1988) (Angel I ). In both suits the Angels sought injunctive relief against a California Superior Court judge based on the judge's alleged due process violations in the Angels' 1978 lawsuit to compel specific performance of a land sale contract. Before their recent forays into federal court, the Angels had repeatedly and…