Ralph R. Becerra v. Metro, a Municipality of the City of Seattle, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Dave Lilly, Dale Neumann

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph R. BECERRA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METRO, a Municipality of the City of Seattle, Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, Dave Lilly, Dale Neumann, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35412. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 4, 1992. * Decided June 15, 1992. Before EUGENE A. WRIGHT, CANBY and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph Becerra appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for Metro, Dave Lilly and Dale Neumann. Becerra argues that he presented questions of material fact that preclude summary judgment. We affirm. DISCUSSION I. Becerra's Motions to this Court A. The Motion to Supplement the Record 3 As an initial matter, we address three motions that Becerra has made to this court. The first is his June 25, 1991 motion to supplement the record with affidavits from coworkers. We will ordinarily not consider on appeal factual matters not raised before the…