Ronald L. Adams v. James Rowland, Director California Department of Corrections Charles D. Marshall
Opinion
Opinion
967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald L. ADAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director California Department of Corrections; Charles D. Marshall, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16168. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 8, 1992. * Decided July 10, 1992. Before POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ronald L. Adams, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim and on summary judgment grounds. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review both claims de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and affirm. 1 3 * Dismissal for Failure to State a Claim 4 Adams's amended complaint alleged that prison officials denied him due process by placing him in solitary confinement without cause or a proper…