Magdy Mohamed Anwar v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Magdy Mohamed ANWAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70428. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 2, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Magdy Mohamed Anwar, a native and citizen of Egypt, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") summary dismissal of his appeal for failure to adequately specify the grounds for the appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1 (d)(1-a)(i). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a and deny the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 On August 3, 1990, Anwar was issued an order to show cause why he should not be deported pursuant to section 241(a)(2) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act ("Act"), 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (a)(2), as an alien who entered the United States without inspection and…