In Re Moses N. Aslan, Debtor. The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Central Bank v. Moses N. Aslan, the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Central Bank v. Moses N. Aslan

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Moses N. ASLAN, Debtor. The HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION; Central Bank, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Moses N. ASLAN, Defendant-Appellant. The HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION; Central Bank, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Moses N. ASLAN, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 89-55629, 89-55702. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1990. Decided May 29, 1992. Before REINHARDT, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB, HALL, and RYMER, * Circuit Judges. ORDER The memorandum disposition filed March 25, 1991, is hereby withdrawn. MEMORANDUM ** Moses N. Aslan appeals, and the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation and Central Bank ("the Banks") cross-appeal, from a decision of the district court which affirmed a decision of the bankruptcy court that sustained in part, and overruled in part, Aslan's objections to an amended proof of claim filed by the Banks. We affirm. * Stipulated judgments and…