Air Separation, Inc. v. William H. Cauley Ins., Inc., a Florida Corp., Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee v. G.A. Haynes British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellants, Air Separation Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Alexander Howden, Ltd., and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Etc.

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. AIR SEPARATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM H. CAULEY INS., INC., a Florida Corp., Defendant-cross-defendant-Appellee, v. G.A. HAYNES; British Aviation Ins. Co., Ltd., Defendants-cross-claimants-Appellants, AIR SEPARATION INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander HOWDEN, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. and Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Etc., et al., Defendant. Nos. 91-15632, 91-15660. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1992. Decided June 17, 1992. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Air Separation owned an aircraft that was operated by Jet Charter. Jet Charter was responsible for insuring the plane and paying the premiums, but Air Separation was the designated loss payee of the policy. Insurance was obtained from Lloyd's of London through Cauley, an insurance agent, and Howden, an insurance broker. Aircraft…