Michael L. Alexander v. Gail Frank, Bonnie Majak, and Virginia Krause

Good Law
967 F.2d 583·1992 WL 149679·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 24550
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199291-35587California615 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 583 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael L. ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gail FRANK, Bonnie Majak, and Virginia Krause, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35587. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 1992. * Decided June 30, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Michael L. Alexander, an Alaska state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Alexander's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We review de novo, Darring v. Kincheloe, 783 F.2d 874, 876 (9th Cir.1986), and we affirm. 3 Alexander contends that he was denied due process and equal protection and subjected to cruel and unusual punishment while he was a pretrial detainee because prison officials classified him at the maximum security/maximum custody level and placed undue restrictions on him. These contentions lack merit. 4 Prisoners do not have a constitutional right…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.