Robert Lee Cash v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert Lee CASH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 90-56078. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 1, 1992. * Decided June 11, 1992. 1 Before D.W. NELSON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and PANNER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Robert Lee Cash, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. He contends the evidence introduced at his state court trial was insufficient to support his conviction of second degree murder and the trial court erred in refusing to give a defense-requested jury instruction regarding robbery and the felony murder rule. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , following the issuance of a certificate of probable cause by this court. We affirm. 4 We review a district court's…