Callahan v. Bettinelli

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sherry B. CALLAHAN (Burke); Jonathan E. Hughes, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William BETTINELLI; Laurence Sawyer, Judge; Lloyd Von Der Mehden; Exchange Bank, Cindy Perez, William Reinking, Attorney Roger Illsley, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16215. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 26, 1992. * Decided June 4, 1992. Before FARRIS, DAVID R. THOMPSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Sherry B. Callahan and Jonathan E. Hughes appeal pro se the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review de novo. Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1447 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm. 3 Callahan and Hughes challenge state court proceedings decided against them, including one action in which they sued bank officials for alleged errors arising from an alleged conspiracy by…