Busch v. City of Long Beach

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Henry T. BUSCH; Helen G. Busch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF LONG BEACH; Long Beach Dep't of Planning & Building; Eugene J. Zeller; Clarke Searle; Clarke Searle Family Trust; John W. Gaddis; Tom Sauter, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55703. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 5, 1992. * Decided June 10, 1992. 1 Before D.W. NELSON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and PRO, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Plaintiffs Helen and Henry Busch appeal the district court's dismissal of their complaint, arguing that the district court erroneously found that their complaint was barred by res judicata and that the one year statute of limitations for bringing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims had expired. We affirm the district court's decision on res judicata grounds. 4 After plaintiffs were determined to be in violation of various housing codes, they filed a series of appeals to the…