Mark Blumberg v. California Medical Facility

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark BLUMBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA MEDICAL FACILITY, Respondent-Appellee. No. 86-16075. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1990. Decided June 17, 1992. 1 Before CHAMBERS and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Blumberg appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition denying relief from his state court convictions for assault with a deadly weapon, false imprisonment, assault with intention to commit rape and enhancements for use of a firearm and intent to inflict great bodily harm on the victim. We affirm. 4 Petitioner's trial in state court was far from perfect. However, that is not the test for habeas relief. We must determine whether on habeas review in federal court the claimed errors are reviewable and whether, if error, they warrant reversal. Since no timely objection was made to the trial judge as to the…