In Re Annette Bell, Debtor. Annette Bell v. Casa Sierra Apartments

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Annette BELL, Debtor. Annette BELL, Appellant, v. CASA SIERRA APARTMENTS, Appellee. No. 91-55144. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 24, 1992. * Decided July 6, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Annette Bell appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's ("BAP") affirmance of the bankruptcy court's judgment dismissing the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case Bell filed to prevent her eviction from her month-to-month tenancy and lifting the automatic stay to allow creditor Casa Sierra Apartments to pursue state court remedies to regain possession of the apartment Bell occupied. The BAP found that dismissal of the Chapter 11 case was proper because Bell failed to comply with the trustee's guidelines and the local rules, and she was unable to effectuate a reorganization plan because she had no assets to reorganize. 1 The BAP also found that…