Bodnar v. Motorola, Inc.

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph BODNAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., a Delaware corporation; McDonnell Douglas Corporation, a Maryland corporation; McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Delaware corporation; Honeywell, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15710. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1992. Decided May 29, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, CV90-628-PHX-PGR; Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding. Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants on Bodnar's claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act [ADEA], 29 U.S.C. § 621 et. seq. It was conceded for purposes of the motion that defendants maintained a practice of requiring bachelor's degrees for certain positions. However, the district court held…