Harvey Clarence Bunker v. Robert Borg, Warden

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harvey Clarence BUNKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert BORG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-15205. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 7, 1991. Decided May 26, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; No. CV-87-1672-RAR 2 Raul A. Ramirez, District Judge, Presiding. 3 E.D.Cal. 4 AFFIRMED. 5 Before PREGERSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, * District Judge. 6 MEMORANDUM ** 7 Petitioner Harvey Clarence Bunker appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Bunker was convicted on the basis of his negotiated guilty plea of first degree robbery-felony murder in the Yuba County Municipal Court. He now challenges the conviction on the grounds that his guilty plea was involuntary and that his counsel was ineffective. We affirm. 8 Our review is de novo. Tatum v.…