Frank R. Borders v. Mark Allan Alan Traywick

967 F.2d 584 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frank R. BORDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark ALLAN; Alan Traywick, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35711. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 19, 1992. Before FLETCHER, LEAVY and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frank R. Borders, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action in favor of Mark Allan, a state employee, and Allen Traywick, a psychologist in private practice. The district court found that Allan and Traywick were absolutely immune from suit. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 110 S.Ct. 3217 (1990), and affirm. See id. 3 * Background 4 Defendant Mark Allan is a forensic therapist and a state employee at Western State Hospital.…