Gary W. Ching v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director of Adoc

Good Law
967 F.2d 585·1992 WL 123834·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23961
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 2, 199291-15491California653 words

Opinion

Opinion

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gary W. CHING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director of ADOC, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15491. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1992. * Decided June 2, 1992. Before FERGUSON, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gary W. Ching appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we reverse. 3 Appellant Ching brought this action in 1987 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several prison officials alleging various violations of the eighth and fourteenth amendments. The district court granted summary judgment, and on appeal we reversed and remanded in part, allowing the case to continue on the issues of attorney contact visitation, access to the courts, and outdoor exercise. Ching v. Lewis, 895 F.2d 608 (9th Cir.1990). 4 Following remand,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.