Denise Dewey v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc., a California Corporation, Denise Dewey v. Wyle Laboratories, Inc., a California Corporation

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Denise DEWEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WYLE LABORATORIES, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Denise DEWEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WYLE LABORATORIES, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 90-16814, 90-15053. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1992. * Decided June 16, 1992. Before JAMES R. BROWNING, PREGERSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 * We affirm the district court's summary judgment for Wyle on the fraud claim. In support of its motion for summary judgment, Wyle presented deposition testimony from its executives that Dewey was hired with the intent she hold the management position and that the reorganization was not planned until after Dewey was hired. In opposition, Dewey presented only speculation that Wyle's witnesses were lying. She offered no facts to support her claim of fraud. 3 A party opposing summary judgment "must do…