Fairfax Savings Association v. Ben Adelman USA Mortgage Corporation United Bank, S.S.B., AKA United Savings Bank, F.S.B.

967 F.2d 585 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. FAIRFAX SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ben ADELMAN; USA Mortgage Corporation; United Bank, S.S.B., aka United Savings Bank, F.S.B. Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55244. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1992. Decided June 23, 1992. 1 Before JAMES R. BROWNING and FARRIS, Circuit Judges, and CAULFIELD, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 One who seeks to reverse the grant of summary judgment must show that there is at least a genuine issue of material fact for trial or that the court on undisputed facts made an error of law. Fairfax Savings Association did neither. The facts, well known to both sides, will not be repeated here. 4 At the time of the transaction, Fairfax was secured by the property, a personal guarantee, and a bond. It failed at the summary judgment stage to: (1) overcome the presumption justifying the conclusion that what it gave was equal in…